___________________________________
The
secret ingredient that transforms most Dracula movies is a good Van Helsing.
After all the Count has it all - immortality, looks and charm. Conversely,
the vampire hunter mostly has obsession but that drive ought to make him
even more frightening than his quarry.
Theoretically, retelling
the vampire myth from the perspective of the hunter should make a dandy
yarn. However, Van Helsing as conceived by filmmaker Stephen
Sommers is a bloated, high decibel affair that has more gadgets
than grit and stands the myth awkwardly on its ear. It is not so much
mindless as it is ill conceived; turning its protagonist (portrayed
by the dashing Hugh Jackman) into a soldier of fortune for the
Vatican on his latest adventure in the grim environs of Transylvania.
Dracula may be the
focus of our heros latest pursuit to eradicate evil from the face
of the earth but Sommers cant leave well enough alone. Hes
also inserted Frankensteins monster and the legend of the Wolfman
into the mix. And in his quest to be all things for all audiences, theres
a romantic interest in the form of Anna Valerious (Kate Beckinsale
speaking with a cartoonish Balkan accent), spawn of a noble line of
vampire killers; and comic relief provided by Friar Carl (David Wenham),
the papal equivalent of James Bond weaponry outfitter Q.
Opening with a nod
to Univesals 1930s monster movies, the film sets up Dracula (Richard
Roxburgh) as patron to mad scientist Victor Frankenstein. The titled
blood sucker salivates over the doctors creation as the inbred
villagers sack his lab and burn him to a crisp in the local windmill.
Meanwhile, in Paris, the intrepid Van Helsing is doing battle with Mr.
Hyde on the rooftops of the city with Notre Dame looming in the background.
Its all terribly evocative and visceral, yet seemingly unconnected
to the rest of the story.
Returning to Rome
for his next assignment, we learn that Van Helsing has no memory of
his past and thats the carrot a Vatican cardinal dangles as he
sends him on a mission to vanquish Dracula and protect the Valerious
clan that have been holding his reign of terror in check for decades.
The film is an impressive
series of set pieces loosely basted by a plot that is at best serviceable
given the pumped up adrenaline pacing. Frankensteins monster,
for no apparent reason, is the life force that will awaken the thousands
of bat children conceived by the Count and his trio of brides. Annas
brother has been transformed into a werewolf and subjugated by the vampire
but, according to Sommers mythology, is also the only being capable
of vanquishing Dracula. While the filmmakers introduce several intriguing
notions and permutations, they rely too often on coincidence and happenstance
to push the narrative along.
The effects themselves
are also in need of a rethink. The double-edged sword that is computer
generated illusion is, on the pro side, the ability to do virtually
anything. Still, with it comes a serious diminution of ones suspension
of disbelief. When a character swings across a phony ravine one ought
to be going ooooh and too often the response elicited
is: they did it in the lab.
Bram Strokers
Abraham Van Helsing was sixty and, perhaps, a distant relative of Jackmans
Gabriel Van H. One can recognize the allure of transforming him into
a superhero but in so doing it seriously unbalances the stakes between
the incarnation of evil and a mere mortal. Even McDonalds has
come to the realization that super sizing is a bad idea and one can
only hope the Hollywood majors will emerge from their current misguided
reverie and realize bigger is not in itself better.
-
Leonard Klady