___________________________________
Jesus:
the other white meat.
Not to be unduly
irreverent about Mel Gibson's brutal, explicit 125-minute succession
of graven images, The Passion of The Christ, but what you will
witness, if you choose to attend, is a movie more violent than most
of those condemned as part of what certain groups refer to today as
"the culture."
There have already
been a variety of compelling essays and reviews about Gibson's self-financed
project and self-financed distribution, but I want to fix on the same
thing that he does: the violence inflicted upon his Christ. (What would
Riggs do?)
The Passion of
The Christ is a tract, more sophisticated, certainly, than Jack
Chick's perverse evangelistic comics, yet it serves as a vessel
to hold one's established beliefs, whether one is a devout Baptist or
Matt Drudge or Peggy Noonan or Rush Limbaugh. (And
the President has expressed a desire to see the film, it's said.)
As a movie, however,
it's something else altogether. The Passion of The Christ is
a loud, thudding lockstep depiction of torture and murder. There is
little about philosophy, goodness or celebration. It's like many of
Gibson's earlier roles writ large: I'm suffering here! For those
who found Willem Dafoe's iconography in Platoon or various
suffering-Christ roles by Kevin Costner and Gibson to be too
little, here is a protracted representation of the iconic man himself
having his flesh rent into tatters, shredding into gobs of viscera.
Jets of blood and bodily fluids are dwelt upon with as much reverence
as other viscous fluids are memorialized in commonplace pornography.
Anti-Semitic? Maybe
to some viewers. Pornographic? Certainly. As keenly as the work of several
other artists-Clive Barker and Pier Paolo Pasolini (particularly
with his Salo: The 120 Days of Sodom) - The Passion of The
Christ is, on the face of it, a homoerotic sadomasochistic fantasia
of being stripped of One's photogenic flesh (Jim Caviezel).
We are shown the
last twelve hours of the Nazarene, with elements drawn from Matthew,
Mark, Luke and Mel (Forecast: Old and New Testament with a chance of
intermittent Apocrypha). It should further debates about the esthetics
and ethics of depicting brutality, which, by conservative estimate,
include visual depictions of the act and aftermath of thirteen punches,
slaps or blows to the head, thirty-four blows with canes; thirty-one
lashes; a crown of thorns pressed to his temples; at least thirty-one
whip lashings, two draggings through the rabble, including varieties
of spitting and stoning; fifty-two blows with a cat o' nine tails with
metal studs and hooks, including one shot of flesh ripping away and
splattering camera and wielder; twelve blows to get a spike through
an ankle; four blows to spike the first palm, with arterial blood jetting
thickly upward; twelve blows for the second, and the puncturing by sword
of Christs side and belly, blood and fluids geysering on the faces
below. Gibson's Christ starts to resemble Barker's Pinhead character
from the Hellraiser movies. There are late close-ups of Caviezel's blood-matted
eye that resemble a medieval icon, or more to point, the Icon Productions
logo that opens the movies Gibson produces, including this one, which
opens without titles, only the name of Newmarket Films, and Icon, with
a flourish of grumbly thunder.
"Jesus wept"
is the shortest verse in the King James Bible; in the Book of Mel, it's
"Jesus Bled." Or maybe we're watching Jeepers Creepers 3,
considering that Satan is pictured as a stone-eyed drag queen with alopecia,
like a character in one of Victor Salva's twisted fancies.) The
strenuous level of violence should bear the NC-17 scarlet rating for
its sustained intensity.
The Gospels are
not alien to my experience. Without taking it too deep, my upbringing
in the south was among fundamentalists, Southern Baptists and Pentecostals,
and, as a kid, was baptized in a dark running stream. (Yep, I've heard
speaking in tongues.) But the movie remains only a movie, and a literal-minded
one. He died for your sins: so suffer through my movie! Some, perhaps,
will find the movie as a vehicle to visualize the teachings of the Bible,
which allow them to empathize more deeply with the suffering of Christ.
Yet that is not what the movie accomplishes: my skin prickles still
from the memory of certain preachers' way with language, with metaphor
and the music of storytelling. But there are only one or two flickering
instants I felt anything in this movie. A self-professed sinner, Gibson's
testimony also slots his film as a study in the piety of the reformed
reprobate. Gibson may be a fundamentalist in his own religion, but as
a filmmaker here, he is a literalist, claiming he's evoking his own
version of the story of Paul's epiphany on the road to Damascus by making
this movie.
Where is the glory
of hope, transcendence? This is a message of death. But also a message
of marketing and a knowledge of how the world works: Newmarket Films
president Bob Berney has the rare opportunity to top his own
work in making plain-Jane My Big Fat Greek Wedding into the largest
"independent" movie ever. I won't be surprised if this thing
crosses $100 million in a week.
-
Ray Pride