JANUARY
20, 2006
Two
For The Bowl
It opens with an
unidentified woman cleaning up a bedroom and, when putting something
away in the night table drawer, finding a vibrator. After returning
to consider the object a couple of times to little comic effect, the
unidentified woman grabs the vibrator, turns it on and masturbates.
The metaphor extends
to pretty much the entire movie.
Nicole Holofcener
is a talented filmmaker and will make another good movie one of these
days. The cast, particularly the women - Jennifer Aniston, Joan Cusack,
Catherine Keener, and Frances McDormand - is excellent and
they all have their moments to shine. None plays precisely the expected
notes. Each has their place in the group of seven friends (Aniston not
only doesn't have money, but she is also the only one without a husband,
and the only one without a child.)
But it just doesn't
add up to anything except for some good scenes for a bunch of good actors.
It is not very daring, perhaps in some part because Holofcener chose
an actress who won't do nudity to play the sexually available lead...
and yes, for all intents and purposes, Jennifer Aniston is the
lead of the film. It is not very thought provoking because the two characters
that seem to be thinking about anything (Keener & McDormand) are
either so self-absorbed or allow events to pass with so little real
notice that you walk away with nothing more than you entered with. It
is not great quirky stuff because the quirks are so mundane that they
make Desperate Housewives seem like Ionesco.
There are a few
beats that threaten to turn into something significant. But the movie
denies them all into submission. And it is a frustrating stand-off because
the set-ups suggest possible outcomes that would be trite and irritating
as well. If someone starts acting oddly and out of sorts, you are always
expecting the terminal disease. You don't want that. But you don't want
her to just feel better at some point either.
Still, there are
those beats for all of these actresses that are wonderful. Keener gets
to be the bottom in a relationship for a change. McDormand gets to rant.
Aniston gets to charm without coyness. And Joan Cusack not only
goes a whole film without being called upon to mug once, but shows a
flash of her so underappreciated brilliance in a workout scene.
One of the repeating
bits is about a sexual relationship with someone who is so disconnected
that he borders on being abusive. I was willing to go there. But it
just doesn't go anywhere. Aniston gets to fire off perhaps the best
line of the movie in the midst of it, but the exploration is as shallow
as the guy she's sleeping with, so it is just a one-night stand for
us.
I get the feeling
that this film was closer to Ms. Holofcener's reality than her first
two films were... and perhaps that is the problem. Just because it is
a source of intrigue in your coffee klatch does not make it a dramatic
film. Friends With Money is not far off of Spanglish as
a weak film that examines how the rich suffer with all the probative
intensity of "Who's On First?"
Too bad.
Of course, this
bit of fictional narcissism takes a backseat to the home movies of Stewart
Copeland that pretend to be a documentary called Everybody Stares:
The Police Inside Out. When Robert Redford and Geoff Gilmore
suggest (and I usually agree with them) that the invasion of Sundance
by the vapid likes of Paris Hilton is a sideshow not of their
own making, one only needs to point to an entry like this, which cannot
really qualify even to be called a film. It is insipid in the way that
watching anyone's home movies is... yes, even Sting can be just
plain boring.
Of course, it is
a one-of-a-kind because only a member of The Police could assemble
this footage and get his partners to sign off in its exploitation. But
as Copeland, blissfully unaware of how childish he sounds, narrates
the film, you can hardly believe that he thought this is something worth
showing others... especially in light of recent great works like Scorsese's
Dylan doc and Berlinger/Sinofsky's Metallica doc.
I prayed for a noble
failure of the kind that some South Bank Show episodes turned
out to be, but there was nothing compelling enough in the material to
deliver that kind of challenge.
Still, I remain
hopefully yours...