LAFFING WEEKEND
There were a
few highlights for me at the LA Film Festival this weekend. In order
of occurrence
I was heading
home on Friday night after seeing an interesting doc, Paper Dolls,
that came up a little short. The story of five Filipino immigrants
to Israel who care for the elderly by day and do a drag show at
night sounds great on paper. But the truth is, once you got past
the shock value of the story, there just wasn't anyplace to go.
You care about these people and that is to the director's credit.
But it's basically a one act story with a coda at the end.
So I went and
checked out the Target Red Room, the LAFF's hospitality suite, which
is loaded with popcorn, cookies, candy, and an ocean of Absolut
Vodka. There, I ran into Luke Y Thompson, New Times'
tallest, most tattooed, most multi-color haired critic and he told
me about the film he was most anticipating on the entire schedule
Hot Chicks.
Somehow, as
I was jamming through the online catalog for the festival, I just
went right past Hot Chicks. But had I been paying closer
attention, I would have been almost as enthusiastic as Luke. The
screening was of 9 short films, each based on one of what are known
as Chick Tracts. They are those little cartoon booklets that you
have probably had handed to you on the streets of some part of town
where souls are in need of saving. These mini-comics were all written
and drawn by Jack T. Chick. According to
his website, over 500 million of these things have been sold
to groups and distributed across the globe. 500 million!
My memory is
of getting these from Jews For Jesus followers. Others remember
other religious groups handing them out. The clever thing is, they
are so cheap to purchase (15 cents) that they make an impressive
handout. And they are all stories of salvation that end with an
admonition to accept Jesus into your life.
So I settled
into my seat at The Crest to see the films and quickly found out
that the folks who made the films were all friends and had all spurred
each other on to make these films over the last 5 or 6 years. Each
film has a distinctly different style, including two of the films
that were made by the same team. One of these films by Rodney
& Syd recreated the Chick
Tract "Titanic" using the Jim Cameron film,
Titanic. Their second film, based on the
tract, Somebody
Goofed, was one of my favorite of the nine. They essentially
take the drawn images in the Chick
Tract and bring them to life in very clever animation.
The films that
stuck closest to the tracts were probably my favorites. All of the
films adhered to the idea that Chick's words would be the script
and that the tracts would serve, to some degree, as storyboards.
But styles varied widely. What was fascinating was how each filmmaker
(many are first time filmmakers) decided to do their interpretation.
For instance, the first film, Bewitched?
(by Tim Kirk - Chick
Tract), used puppets to tell its story of how television infects
the culture. One of the films, Wounded
Children (by Todd Hughes - Chick
Tract), is based on a tract that has been taken off the market
because the morays around child abuse have changed. In that film,
the victimized child is played by a mannequin while everyone around
him is played by adults. Angels?
(by Tommy! - Chick
Tract), the story of a rock-n-roll dream attained and then destroying
the dreamers, is done in a style best described as post-modern Super
8 by way of Kenneth Anger.
Cleo
(by Bryce Ingman - Chick
Tract) is a story about a lost dog who narrowly escapes a dog
pound needle and somehow, amazingly, its owners see this as God's
intervention and it moves them to being born again. Doom
Town (by P. David Ebersole - Chick
Tract) tells the story of Sodom & Gomorrah. And La
Princesita (by Jamie Tolbert Franklin - Chick
Tract) tells the story of a sick young girl who desperately
wants to go trick-or-treating on Halloween and does and has her
soul saved when one of the neighbors drops a Chick Tract into her
candy bag.
My favorite
of the films, probably because it is most precisely a Chick
Tract come to life, was Party
Girl, directed by Anonymous. Why anonymous? Because there is
some fear that Jack Chick, who is still alive at 82, might
get all litigious on their collective asses.
The filmmaker
actually gave me permission - after some pleasant harassment - to
publish her name. But after seeing how often the Chick Publications
sends out cease and desists, I have decided to keep it to myself.
She is an actress, remarkably beautiful, very sharp, surprisingly
unflinching about the truth, terribly well married and, by amazing
coincidence, did a guest spot on a Sunday night primetime TV show
that I Tivo'd.
(In another
odd showbiz small world coincidence, a guy playing in an old friend's
charity poker tourney on Sunday was pitching a local stage show
starring this woman's husband. And almost more oddly, I had dinner
with this woman's ex-husband just a week ago - and I had never before
met this woman or had any social conversation with this man until
these two meetings. High school with money indeed!)
I don't know
if she has a future as a director based on this short, satirical
film but, like I said before
concept is everything on these
and, to me, she got the inherent joke of Chick Tracts best of all,
so much so that the film could really be seen as a positive and
believing take on a Chick Tract if your beliefs went that way.
The bottom line
is, this group has no interest in distributing their films for any
revenue. (Fact is, very few of them could get clearances on their
pre-recorded music or images from other media.) They aren't even
posting their films to their
website. They screened at LAFF and will show again at Outfest
at midnight on July 8. From there, who knows.
Anyway
I am going to go out on a limb and post a short clip from Anonymous'
film, Party Girl. It is four pieces from her work, slapped
together shoddily via QT Pro. But it'll give you some idea
and it makes me smile like crazy. Here
is the 3mg QT file
NEXT!
On Saturday
afternoon, I had the chance to catch Julie Anderson, CC Goldwater
and Tani Cohen's Mr. Conservative: Goldwater On Goldwater.
The film is,
of course, about Barry Goldwater and in this telling, is
given some perspective by Goldwater's granddaughter CC, who initiated,
co-produced, and stars in the film. As regular readers may have
realized, I am not a huge fan of doc filmmakers being their films
unless it is very much a part of the style of the film. But the
film, which is headed to HBO in the fall, has a lot of screentime
taken up with home movies from the Goldwater family, many shot by
Barry himself.
The film reminded
me, in the big strokes, of Henriette Mantel and Steve
Skrovan's An
Unreasonable Man, the excellent and undercovered Sundance doc
about Ralph Nader. (The film certainly suffered from the
death of Nader's sister, which led to his absence at the festival,
which led to a relative paucity of coverage of, perhaps, the most
important doc at Sundance this year.) Both films are about men seen
as political extremists and both films are about the men being iconoclastic
and unrestrainedly honorable and above the fray. (As I have written
before, An Unreasonable Man does an excellent job of explaining
the mythology of Nader costing Al Gore the 2000 election
and the scapegoating that followed and continues.)
Goldwater to
the right and Nader to the left could not be much more dissimilar
in personal style. Goldwater was a handsome, almost movie-staresque,
Arizona icon who reeked of personal charisma. Nader was hard-edged
and abrasive. But both men were more than they appeared. And both
leave a trail of achievements that have been forgotten by most people.
Moreover, both men have survived massive changes in the political
spectrum so that the perception of where they stood changed. But
the truth is, they both stayed firm as the world changed
firm
not as stubborn, but firm based on a moral position.
Mr. Conservative
leans heavily on footage of Goldwater in the place he loved most
dearly, his native Arizona. He traveled by air, in the cockpit by
himself, visiting the smallest nooks and crannies of the land, anywhere
he could land a plane. He was a hands-on supporter of the Native
Americans, embracing them, offering them medical help, and being
surprisingly open to their lives and their plight.
The film interestingly
suggests, though does not confirm clearly, that two of Barry
Goldwater's most surprising turns in his later career, his stands
on abortion and gays in the military, were turned in some ways by
family events. On the other hand, there are indicators throughout
the film that Goldwater was never interested in putting restraints
on gays, blacks or women (though he did feel gays should not be
in the military while he was in the service).
Personally,
I would have liked a lot more information about what he did with
his 30 years in the Senate. The film speaks to the highlights of
his political career and does a great job with the 1964 presidential
election. But he spent more than 5000 days of his life going to
work on Capital Hill. There are a lot of details there.
Still, the movie
is a great watch. And at its best, it reminds us about the best
of what politics is supposed to be about
what we still want
to believe our American system is all about
what we still
want to be believe is possible. Watching the film, I realized
I am a Goldwater Democrat. An oxymoron? No. Because the name Goldwater
had wider breath and width than our politic parties now do. I am
with that guy. And when we disagree, we will argue it out like adults
who respect other adults. Ah, to sleep, perchance to dream
FINALLY
Saturday night,
I was at the premiere of Amy Berg's Deliver
Us From Evil, the documentary I wrote about at
The Hot Button last Wednesday.
I had seen the
film before (obviously), but it was quite something to see it on
a big screen with a full theater at The Crest. Not only that, but
with two of the victims of Ollie O'Grady and their families.
I haven't really
seen a crowd reaction at a film festival like this one opened to
since the rock concert atmosphere around Jon Demme's Neil
Young film, Heart of Gold, back at Sundance in January.
Before that, I really can't recall. There were three standing ovations
for the film, the filmmakers, and the participants. And it took
a lot of work by the staff of The Crest and LAFF to get the audience
out of the theater. Everyone seemed to want to linger and discuss
what they had just experienced.
When I stood
up to go, I saw that a feature director I know and quite like, was
in an intense discussion about the film with his wife
and
I just walked away, not wanting to interrupt.
As for myself,
I am hardly a shy person, but I couldn't quite bring myself to have
a conversation with the victims or their families. What do you say?
How can you express the power of their willingness to tell their
stories. Seeing the film again, I realized how much I personally
identified with the father of one of the girls, who is also, pretty
much, the most emotionally expressive of all the people in the film.
And even that night, as he was handed the microphone to speak, he
started cracking as he described his daughter's courage and his
admonition that if the family was going to make this film that they
not be hidden behind some screen or blur
if they were going
to speak out, they would speak out freely
no hiding. Courageous.
More distributors
are heading to the Monday afternoon screening of the film, which
will not be nearly as full as Saturday night's screening. It will
be interesting to hear how that goes. I often recall our five screenings
of the frat house rape doc, Raw Deal: A Question of Consent
in Miami and how each audience took it differently. It will be pretty
close to impossible to find an audience who will not be sympathetic
to these victims and horrified by Oliver O'Grady. But smaller
variations seem likely. And some distributor seems poised to have
the opportunity to offer the world one of the great screen villains
of all time
who isn't George Bush.