P.S.
Toronto ...
I began my annual
journey to Toronto with a degree of ambivalence and a week after its
conclusion I can't seem to shake that feeling. However, distance has
at least provided a glimmer of perspective.
Somewhere hidden
in the deluge of movies presented this year and in other recent incarnations
is a great festival. For that matter, given enormously bad luck, one
could easily conclude the event was second rate or struggling to find
its niche.
As odd as what I'm
about say is, it's a festival with simply too many movie options. There
were somewhere on the order of 250 new features in this year's program
and I managed to cram about 40 of them into my schedule.
Strictly speaking
about one-quarter of my selections were things I was obliged to see
for immediate assignments. At the same time I can count only five films
that I wound up catching based upon recommendations or buzz. To be clear,
I'm talking about five films that I would otherwise not have bothered
to seek out. In two of those instances I was truly unimpressed.
The lingering ambivalence
mostly relates to what I'll call my options - more than half of the
movie choices that were based upon some inner compulsion. Some were
driven by the talent involved; others upon acclaim at other festivals
or my familiarity with them as a result of their popularity in their
country of origin. There were probably also no more than a couple of
films that were seen simply because of the happenstance of being at
a particular theater at a propitious time.
The other day I
culled through the program catalogue simply to jog my memory about what
I'd seen. In the process, one cannot help but be confronted by what
was missed and the queasy feeling about whether one will catch up with
certain movies at another festival, market, special screening or possible
theatrical run.
For a split second
the thought went through my mind that I ought to have seen some film
instead of something I did in fact select. It's simply human nature
to winnow out the bad experiences and replace them with more positive
ones. However, my more reasoned side quickly came to the fore with the
sage reminder that no matter how much preparation and research one does
to map out a festival strategy, one is still likely to see the same
mix of good, bad and indifferent pictures.
The exercise was
more illuminating in a general sense. Toronto shows far too many high
profile movies from Hollywood and other movie capitols of the world.
I understand and appreciate that events of this stature and magnitude
require an element of glitz to stir the crowd and attract the fleeting
focus of the mainstream press.
The thorny question
is when does that factor become too much. While there's no definite
answer, I'll offer that when the din of that particular component drowns
out virtually everything else on view it's time to reassess and rebalance
the scales.
Toronto is due for
some recalibration, though my suspicion is that it's evolved into a
glutton that cannot resist anything set upon its table. And while it
recognizes that the culinary offerings submitted can be assembled into
a well balanced meal, its voracious side is a sucker for stuffing itself
with too many eye-catching confections.
The galas and special
presentations that fuel most of the public noise at Toronto are invariably
littered with the most mundane and mediocre fare. With so many set for
imminent commercial release, I elected to forego new films from Ridley
Scott, Anthony Minghella and Michael Apted as well as Emilio
Estevez's portrait of Robert Kennedy, simply titled Bobby.
While summary judgment will have to wait, none of my colleagues were
prodding me to catch up with that particular quartet.
What I did catch
was likely not much better. Christopher Guest's skewering of
Hollywood in For Your Consideration had an underlying mean spirit
that dilutes much of its intended mirth, while Infamous trod
in the footprints of Capote to general disadvantage. The Last
Kiss simply had no good reason for selection and Stranger Than
Fiction, while ultimately emotionally moving, was largely an opportunity
to see the likes of Will Ferrell, Emma Thompson and Dustin
Hoffman do their stuff in material a couple of notches above the
usual studio offerings.
One also has to
wonder about the inclusion of All the King's Men for other than
mercenary reasons. Whatever qualities it possesses are undone by Sean
Penn's unbalanced performance and the curious absence of a scene
that indicates the Willie Stark character's transition from good to
bad. Without that requisite scene the story simply makes no sense.
The Last King
of Scotland tells virtually the same story as King's Men with far
greater success. Forrest Whitaker as Ugandan despot Idi Amin
is afforded the opportunity to show the leader's charm prior to his
descent into megalomania. James McAvoy is also excellent as the
Scottish doctor that becomes his personal physician and sees the arc
of his demise in this little treasure of a film.
The highlight of
the high profile screenings was Todd Field's Little Children,
a complex examination of small town mores. While largely centering on
infidelity, there's a secondary thread involving a convicted pedophile's
return to the community. Field has matured as a filmmaker both on a
craft level and in his storytelling and that's no mean feat in light
of his debut with In the Bedroom. His use of the setting provides
an organic framework for diverse tales and instills a humanity that
elicits shock, humor and compassion without effortless aplomb.
Certainly an understandable
mandate of Toronto is to showcase Canadian films and apart from the
built in dilemma of limited selectivity and sometime misplaced chauvism,
it's resulted in some sterling discoveries over the years. In that regard
Away from Her, the directorial debut of actress Sarah Polley,
is this year's prime example. Far from a warm bath, the saga of a marriage
unwinding with the wife's descent into dementia and Alzheimer's is unsparing
and unsentimental. There's already talk of an Oscar qualifying run for
Julie Christie though veteran Gordon Pinsent as her husband
has the more substantial role.
Opening night served
up The Journals of Knud Rasmussen, from the filmmakers responsible
for The Fast Runner, and while hardly ideal fare for a patron
audience, it proved a challenging and compelling saga. Decidedly a demanding
work, it evolves into a rumination about the arrival of the modern world
into Inuit society in the early 20th Century and provides little solace
about that evolution.
A likely better
opening night selection would have been Guy Maddin's Brand
Upon the Brain, a silent film presented in strict traditional fashion.
The story is vintage melodrama involving a man returning to the island
home of his youth to fulfill his mother's last request. The flashback
that composes the main section of the film is more in keeping with the
filmmaker's sense of fun and the truly bizarre. It was unquestionably
the best theater of the festival with a live orchestra, foley artists
in lab coats providing the sound effects, a narrator and a castrato
singer. A similar mounting will occur during the New York Film Festival
and hopefully other venues in the next year.
Off campus I caught
the Canadian bilingual thriller Bon Cop Bad Cop. Heavily influenced
by Seven and other dark procedurals it recently became the biggest
grossing local film in Quebec and has grossed an unprecedented $11 million
across Canada. Otherwise it's rather routine with no obvious evidence
for its outrageously popular local appeal.
Coincidently, Korea's
biggest grossing movies, The Host and The King and the Clown,
were also on view at the festival. The Host recently took the
commercial crown and like the Canadian thriller there's nothing about
this monster movie that suggests it tapped into the national zeitgeist.
The film has high production values with a malevolent creature reminiscent
of Alien - the result of chemical mutation - ultimately brought
to bay by a dysfunctional but determined family.
The King and
the Clown is a far different tale. Set in a 16th Century court,
it's based on a true life ruler's infatuation with a group of street
performers. The film has a nice ragged energy with the traveling players
providing the humor and acrobatics against the backdrop of rather fierce
political intrigue.
On a similar note,
Alatrieste chronicles the same era from a Spanish perspective
with Viggo Mortensen in the title role. Currently wildly popular
in Spain, it's more somberly paced and truly unlikely to find an international
audience. Spain was better served by Almodovar's magical Volver
and Pan's Labyrinth, a disturbing allegory set in the 1940s with
Franco's soldiers embodying pure evil against rebels and mystical forces
in the woods. A brief description simply cannot do it justice.
Perhaps the biggest
personal surprise was Lake of Fire, a documentary on abortion
rights that filmmaker Tony Kaye has been working on sporadically
since 1992. In retrospect one can understand that the subject matter
with its highly charged emotional nature would pose a challenge for
someone trying to affect a balanced, articulate perspective. It is amazing,
enthralling material presented in a fashion that will be disturbing
for viewers regardless of their preconceived notions and biases.
The other rather
startling documentary in the program was the deceptively titled A
Pervert's Guide to the Cinema. Directed by Sophie Fiennes
it explores the implications of the intrinsic voyeuristic nature of
the movie going experience. Psychoanylist Slavoj Zizek proves
himself an able tour guide with a sang froide attitude and Slavic lilt.
Coeurs is
the latest from Alain Resnais who recently celebrated his 83rd
birthday. He won the award for direction in Venice and it has an elegant,
assured style. However, there's nothing particularly revelatory about
this yarn of a half dozen Parisians whose lives intertwine in fitfully
humorous and emotional encounters.
On the whole it
wasn't a great year for the auterist filmmakers. Nuri Bilge Ceylan's
Climates doesn't quite coalesce in its view of the seasons of
life though it features one of the most remarkable sex scenes ever put
on film. I'd also been warned to expect disappointment from Lights
in the Dusk by Aki Kurasmaki but found this story of a man
whose ill fortune cannot be reversed to be quite compelling and consistent
if a tad familiar.
Paul Verhoeven's
first Dutch film in decades, Black Book, showed him in top technical
form in a saga of Dutch resistance against Nazi occupiers. However,
plot inconsistencies and a rather ragged conclusion marred my complete
enjoyment. Conversely, Rescue Dawn, in which Christian Bale
plays a downed U.S. pilot in Laos circa 1965, presented Werner
Herzog in the unusual light of an action director. Displaying none
of the filmmaker's past idiosyncratic style, it's a flag raiser one
suspects he made simply to prove the point he could make a completely
conventional movie.
The one entry that
lived up to its promise was Cannes prize winner The Wind That Shakes
the Barley by Ken Loach. The tale of two brothers caught
in the crossfire of the Irish independence movement of the 1920s is
one of his most assured works and eschews the polemics of some past
efforts. It carries an emotional wallop that's devastating and honest
without a hint of histrionics.
The French political
thriller Mon Colonel is among the more haunting films of Toronto
with the echoes of the war in Algeria informing its narrative. Not quite
as crisp as the vintage Costa-Gavras (who co-wrote the script), it nonetheless
maintains a disturbing resonance. On the other hand only the startling
images of The Fall linger and cannot overcome a thoroughly banal
script and the tale of Australian aboriginals, Ten Canoes, was
unable to keep my attention, though I suspect it will play better outside
the hurly burly of a festival environment.
The final wry little
gem of the festival turned out to be 12:08 East of Bucharest,
the sort of political fable one hasn't seen since The Mouse That
Roared. On the 16th anniversary that toppled Ceausescu in Romania
a talk show in a small town decides to revisit the moment with a couple
of eyewitnesses. Suffice it to say memories don't jibe with those of
call-in listeners and you suspect this tiny dorp only got to see history
made on their television sets. The sophistication and candor of the
piece is totally unexpected and a far more telling manifestation of
how radically attitudes and expressions have changed in this former
Soviet republic.
October 2, 2006
-
by Leonard Klady