French
Fries ...
There are an infinite
number of good news/bad news gags one can employ to illustrate the inconsistencies
of the motion picture industry.
They all start out
with: Well I've got good news and I've got bad news about (fill in name
of picture of personality). So, let's test it out by slotting in Sahara
and I add the perforce: "first the good news." (pause) "The
movie grossed $125 million." After a five second delay you say:
"So what's the bad news?" And I reply: "The picture cost
$200 million."
Now aside from the
fact that it's a hypothetical example, the routine isn't terribly funny
on the ether page. It might get a few guffaws live but that's entirely
dependent on timing.
The following might
also seem a little flat. The good news is that French movies have almost
consistently been a staple of the foreign-language diet for North Americans
since the dawn of cinema. They might not be the biggest grossers in
any given year but virtually without fail more titles are imported and
shown in mainstream venues. The only industry that has greater representation
is India but its movies play by and large in a separate circuit dedicated
to Bollywood fare.
Last year about
three dozen French productions received at least limited theatrical
exposure in the U.S. and Canada. France produces about 150 movies annually
and on its home turf accounted for about 40 percent of the box office
compared to the roughly 43 percent of market share generated by American
movies last year. Along with Japan, South Korea and India it's one of
the few nation where indigenous movies are competitive with pictures
from the Hollywood majors.
After the United
States, France is the greatest exporter of motion pictures. Last year
Gallic fare generated about $500 million at theaters outside of the
North American domestic marketplace. It wasn't a banner year but films
such as Tais-toi (Ruby and Quentin), Swimming Pool, L'Auberge
Espagnole and The Triplets of Belleville sold and played
well internationally.
The bad news is
that while the United States is France's biggest export market, the
movies it sells here accounted for slightly less than a half of one
percent of the 2004 box office. Again, while not a banner year, it wasn't
a gross distortion of that nation's commercial potency on these shores.
Aside from such
factors as the quality of its movies, the appeal of subject matter and
the development of a core audience, the French are diligent about selling
their product in America. For more than a decade its film industry supported
an event in Sarasota dedicated to their annual inventory but the cost
and prestige never translated into a asset on the balance sheet. Sarasota
has largely been replaced by annual French film weeks in New York and
Los Angeles, the latter dubbed City of Lights, City of Angels is currently
unspooling and features 17 recent efforts yet to secure U.S. distribution.
Closing Night is
the most recent effort by veteran filmmaker Costa-Gavras whose Z
won an Oscar back in 1969 and paved the way for an international career
with Hollywood segues that have ranged from Missing to Mad
City. Still, France has been home for the Greek-born writer-director
for 50 years and he's headed the country's directors guild, the Cinematheque
Francais and is currently president of a Franco-American initiative
that supports events including City of Lights.
His new film is
The Ax (Le Couperet), based on a novel by American Donald
Westlake. Costa-Gavras is a big fan of things American - a brother
in medical research is a long-time Bostonian - including its movies
and literature and he found the tale of a salesman downsized from a
large company who literally decides to kill off the competition as he
fights to get back into the labor force an easy fit for adaptation to
contemporary France. It is the driest of black comedies and has been
a great success at home where it's grossed more than $4 million since
its debut three weeks ago.
He's also a champion
of not only the films of his adopted homeland but of any movie that
promotes cultural diversity.
"No nation
should ever abandon what makes it culturally unique," he says.
"I'm not going to mouth all those things about that which is culturally
specific is universal. Yes, it's true mostly but not always. It's more
complicated than that."
Costa-Gavras was
a major supporter of the cultural exception several years back when
the European Union was hammering out free trade agreements. It is a
hot button issue but he maintains that it was the foundation to promoting
and stimulating cultural diversity.
He remembers a conversation
with an American counterpart who blithely suggested the French stick
to what they did best - making wine and cheese - while preference be
given to the U.S. in the area of film.
"The Motion
Picture Association (of America) likes to say that there should be no
borders or obstacles as if there was equal access in the marketplace.
But that's not true and when it encounters resistance, the association
protects its turf ferociously."
Former MPAA president
Jack Valenti himself was fond of telling tales in which he used
the power of the movies to get his way. One yarn involved frozen funds
in Eastern Europe that led him to approaching the State Department about
a meeting with then Yugoslavian leader Marshall Tito. Valenti
was told that there was a diplomatic logjam in that country and to expect
a delay of between six and 18 months.
Valenti took an
alternate route. He called his buddy Kirk Douglas about taking
a trip and then called Tito's office and said he'd been in Belgrade
with the movie star the following Tuesday and would he have time to
meet them. The rest of the story is relatively pro forma.
Costa-Gavras doesn't
have any plans to enlist Gerard Depardieu and call upon George
Bush but he nonetheless feels that French government and film industry
leaders have to be steadfast and creative about keeping cultural diversity
at the forefront. He says that the issue of piracy has provided a bond
between the two countries that could well extend into other areas.
But he stresses that the current vitality of French cinema as well as
filmmaking throughout Europe and Asia is a new generation of movie makers
that know their craft and audience. The problem is they might also have
an audience outside their physical borders of operation and no means
of accessing it. In France that's been addressed through a program that
provides art cinemas with tax breaks for showing international productions.
Paris has long been a haven for people with a taste for movies from
every corner of the globe and in the past few years that hunger has
spread to other major centers including Lyon and Nice and several collage
towns.
"You have to
recognize what's there; what it is people want even if they don't know
what it is," says Costa-Gavras. "Many of the French politicians
didn't want the cultural exception when it was first introduced because
they didn't understand it. They didn't know that it was the basis of
other things. I'm sure many still don't understand it but they see it
has been very beneficial and maybe that's enough. But you have to keep
vigilant and push them to do other things that support and expand it."
French government
support for film is also structured in a way that makes it easier for
new filmmakers to secure funding. About 30 percent of its annual production
involves first films but many concede that the majority has a difficult
time getting their next production under way. The concern is to make
changes to the program that will turn the process into something slightly
less Darwinian.
Another recent criticism
is what's seen as the Americanization of French movies. The primary
whipping boy in this area is Luc Besson not simply for shooting
many of his films in English but for adopting where are seen as empty-headed
genres with stunts and spectacle. He did three very successful Taxi
movies in France before running the franchise into the ground with an
American version last year.
The whole notion
of what is French was turned on its ear in the past year when government
certification for tax purposes was denied A Very Long Engagement
but extended to Alexander. The panel felt the first film
came up short because it was financed by Warner Bros. but allowed the
latter film an exemption because writer-director Oliver Stone
holds a French passport and did most of his post production in Paris.
"The situation
is often absurd," observes Costa-Gavras. "You have a film
with a French subject made by French filmmakers and technicians in France
in the French language and decide it doesn't meet the criteria because
of an investment from an American company. You're penalizing everyone
for good fortune. The studio didn't come in and say we'll give you the
money if you make it in English and cast an American star. It said we
like the project and make it your way and use your actors and technicians
and we'll distribute it around the world."
He also points to
French investment in a wide variety of European and Asian productions
as good business rather than the imprimatur of a cultural stamp.
"I don't think
I fully realized what attracted me to The Ax until we were shooting
the film," says Costa-Gavras. "Obviously it's an indictment
of how business evolves into something very dehumanizing. You can read
it and accept it as fact but of course it has wider significance and
the way people conduct themselves is alarming and funny. It's double-edged
and if we fail to see the humor in it - as in so many things in life
- we are in real danger of losing our perspective and humanity."
April 16, 2005
-
by Leonard Klady