Pornacopia!
Fussing about just prior
to the start of a screening of Inside Deep Throat, a couple of colleagues
sitting nearby confessed to having never seen the seminal film that was the inspiration
for the documentary. Both were old enough to remember the phenomenon, lived in
areas where it was shown and had valid Ids to gain admission. One even claimed
to never having seen a "hard core" movie - not out of indignation but
simply lack of interest.
In
the seconds before the lights dimmed a thousand memories relating to the XXX era
flashed through my mind (several passed on orally). Notwithstanding porno chic,
I somehow managed to see the original Deep Throat along with its sister
successes The Devil in Miss Jones and Behind the Green Door and
dozens of other scandalous and banal efforts if not in a timely fashion at least
within shouting distance of their notoriety.
I
don't ever recall using the films as a sexual aid. On the time line it would pre-date
the arrival of the VCR by about seven years. I was neither aficionado nor advocate
but fascinated by the movie evolution from clinical documentaries to titillating
educational fare, Russ Meyer romps and I Am Curious (Yellow).
It
should also be mentioned that at the time I lived in presumably liberal Canada.
Despite that perception, the only place where one could buy a ticket for Deep
Throat and its ilk was Vancouver. The other nine provincial film classification
boards opted to contain the desire for this material to soft core variations on
the theme. The local theater that played those racy movies was where I caught
up to the critically acclaimed, Oscar-nominated Dutch film Turkish Delight
that launched the careers of Rutger Hauer and director Paul Verhoeven.
Prior
to the theatrical diminution and eventual demise of the X, I would periodically
be called upon as an expert witness at pornography trials. While some might have
viewed this as a stain on their reputation, it was no more than a day's work for
a working film critic at the local daily newspaper. It in no way related to having
had fleeting social intercourse with either Linda Lovelace or Marilyn
Chambers.
In
retrospect the arrival of graphic sexual activity on screen was explosive. The
early ripples of cinematic nudity were comparatively chaste and it seems almost
laughable now when one recalls the seismic response to a bare breast in The
Pawnbroker or the brief glimpse of full frontal female nudity in Blow Up.
But that was the social context of the times.
Randy Barbato
and Fenton Bailey's recollection of the time, the film and the people
in Inside Deep Throat is a bit like an acid flashback in snapshot form.
The specifics and generalities are on display and some components are well explored
while others are superficially observed. It's a daunting and massive undertaking
that to its credit is entertaining, informative and an apt starting point for
a broader dialogue.
When
Deep Throat became a sensation and unleashed a torrent of imitators in
the early 1970s it seemed only logical that in time there would be a crossover
into the mainstream. There were a couple of manifestations of its effect in tamer,
provocative imports from abroad such as Emmanuelle but the momentum soon
dissipated. In one respect it dovetailed with the mood of the times when social
and political issues from women's liberation to Vietnam were hot button topics.
However, the
sexual revolution could never accommodate the diverse perspectives of Germaine
Greer, Hugh Hefner and Screw magazine's Abe Goldstein. The films
were provocative in the context of the moment and had an additional asset not
fully appreciated in the new film. They were generally funny and glib and the
forthright, irreverent nature of these generally crudely produced movies allowed
them a brief, conspicuous entry into an environment that had long swept carnality
under the carpet.
There
were factions that decried the new pornography on moral grounds and a long list
of court battles focused on the balance between community standards and first
amendment rights. The decisions rendered rarely reflected the evidence presented
or established legal precedent but indicated the whim and prevailing social climate
at a precise venue. They were also smoke screens for other concerns, particularly
the stranglehold organized crime had on this highly profitable sliver of the film
industry.
There
were a couple of "purveyors of smut" who actually wanted to make the
films better such as Radley Metzger. Others such as Francis Coppola
used them as training exercises. The people controlling the purse strings and
the theaters simply saw an enormously fatted calf and could find no good reason
to divert a single penny away from profit and into production values.
When
Oh, Calcutta! (another shocker of the era) was revived on Broadway back in
the early 1980s, I went to a performance with Bob Sickenger a veteran of
the Chicago theater scene who gave, among others, David Mamet his professional
start. Bob had moved to New York and had made a very good American independent
film called Love in a Taxi that had been a festival favorite. He was hopeful
it would launch more ambitious movie projects.
After
the show we repaired to a restaurant for pasta and in the course of talking about
the play he made reference to employing the same bawdy source as the vignette
A Man and His Maid for a movie. At first I presumed he was talking about
a trial balloon and then blurted out: "You directed The Naughty Victorians!"
He was obviously surprised I knew let alone had seen the movie and quick to point
out that he used a nom de screen. Who knows how many other credible people were
involved in such efforts using aliases.
Regardless,
the movies didn't get better. Their commercial appeal was on the wane and might
have completely sputtered out were it not for the timely arrival of home video.
The easy availability of viewing pornography in the privacy of one's home was
the bedrock for a burgeoning ancillary movie market. The small screen was more
forgiving of XXX's technical impressions and while the reigns of that industry
had largely been wrested from the crime czars, the new bosses were no less penurious
about production budgets.
The
porn movie industry began to go underground in the late 1970s and the VCR pretty
much cemented its exit from the front page. Even the trade papers had stopped
tracking box office or writing stories about the sector. It had been relegated
to clandestine status despite the enormous money and profits generated from the
crude capers.
There
were from time to time lurid exposes and scandals like the revelation that starlet
Traci Lords' first erotic screen adventures occurred when she was an underage
minor. Nonetheless they were brief flurries set beside the continuing fascination
the mainstream press accorded the arena in its early years. The revelation that
Chambers had been a model for Ivory Snow was all part of the fodder that made
her and Lovelace celebrities.
The
film makes mention that Throat's Harry Reems was hired to play a role in
the film version of Grease by producer Alan Carr and then quietly
dismissed when Paramount executives got wind of it. Lovelace's efforts at a crossover
were quashed and Chambers got closest when David Cronenberg cast her in
Rabid in 1977. Her work failed to elicit other above ground offers.
The
stigma attached to porno films came quickly and decisively. In the mid-1970s the
Cannes film market was brimming with screenings of XXX movies from America, France,
Germany and various Asian countries. I recall seeing a French film titled Spermula
in the market that playfully combined the vampire myth with the eternal qualities
of blood being replaced by another bodily fluid.
Lovelace
was accorded red carpet treatment in 1974 at Cannes when she arrived to promote
Linda Lovelace for President. That year Francis Coppola won the festival's
top prize for The Conversation and by dint of a friendship with actor Alan
Garfield, I became part of that entourage.
After
the closing night celebrations and dinner the group wound up at the casino. Four
of us - Coppola, French filmmaker Jean Eustache, Bay Area businessman George
Gund and myself - sat down at a table to play vingt-et-un (unrelated to its
literal American equivalent 21). Lovelace and her then current handler David
Winters, a former dancer turned porn filmmaker, filled the other two seats.
Only Eustache knew how to play the game but the headiness of the moment and the
convivial banter erased any need to understand the rules.
The
seating arrangement was in a U-shape with Lovelace seated beside me and Coppola
directly opposite her. He joked about tossing a chip down her cleavage as one
would sink a basketball through a hope. Lovelace laughed and said, "go ahead"
but he declined because he was afraid he might throw too hard and hurt her. She
was charming, funny and gracious and had a quality of innocence one associates
with a newcomer to the industry. She also appeared to be slightly constrained
by Winters who periodically asserted a possessory claim one assumes others wielded
over her during the few years she was a star and money earner.
In
the rear view mirror the memory is tinged with sadness, particularly given the
outward giddiness of the moment. Inside Deep Throat brought back those
mixed emotions and an odd sense of nostalgia not only for the overtly risqué
fare of that era but for all the feisty brood of young filmmakers that included
Scorsese, Spielberg, DePalma, Milius and Malick. It was a time for mavericks and
indulgence was better tolerated but one group evaporated and the other went mainstream
and both paid a price for the passage.
-
by Leonard Klady