The Eye of the Navel 2004
Three years ago
I made a liberating decision. I had sat down to begin the ritual process
of making out a top 10 list for the year. It's not terribly complicated.
1) I make a copy
of the film releases of the year
2) I go down the list and delete titles that won't figure into my favorites.
3) I whittle the list down to 10.
I can't exactly
recall my mood or condition at the time (as I write this I might best
be described as exhausted). What I do recall is that it seemed quite
obvious as I was scrolling and deleting that I'd be hard pressed to
find a minion. It seems to me that I might have also been thinking that
I should only include films that I felt would have some enduring worth.
I didn't want to be reminded of some snap judgment inclusion of a movie
that struck an immediate chord and soured as it echoed off in the distance.
Then it struck me
like a bolt of lightning.
It didn't have to
be a top 10. If there were only five titles, why not simply focus on
them. It seemed to me that in years past I'd managed to shoehorn in
11 or 12 movies using some convenient rationale. So, that year and in
2002 and 2003, the list comprised seven or eight titles.
As I went through
the process once again a few days ago, I chuckled, as the thought of
the tally loomed larger. And something quite extraordinary happened
after the completion of a second pass. There in front of me were 14
titles. I looked at the list once again just to be sure there was no
repetition or a spill over title from the prior year. And as I checked
title by title, it crossed my mind that I couldn't recall a single instance
since January 1st where I, or anyone else, had observed in conversation
that it had been a better than average movie going year.
I looked at the
list one more time attempting to discern whether I had gone soft in
the head. But it was useless. If I had lost my grip, it was far to late
to pull myself from the abyss. So, in no particular order other than
alphabetical I will lay my cards on the table.
Ae Fond Kiss.
An unusually potent tale of racial and religious intolerance that centers
on the romantic relationship between a young Pakistani Muslim and a
transplanted Irish Catholic school teacher in contemporary Glasgow.
Ken Loach is to the Scottish city what Barry Levinson
is to Baltimore and this film and the immediate prior Sweet Sixteen
show the veteran filmmaker in top form. Some of his past films have
tended to be blatantly doctrinaire to the detriment of the drama but
Ae Fond Kiss is defiantly humanistic and begins on such a light
hearted note (the very title suggests something slightly frothy) that
when the true colors of his family and her bosses emerge it is like
a cold slap on the face.
The Aviator.
Of all this year's choices, this is the selection that makes me most
anxious. The early years of flyer/filmmaker/entrepreneur Howard Hughes
as seen by Martin Scorsese is unquestionably uneven storytelling.
There's little sense of intent during its first half hour, characters
weave in and out; sometimes without purpose and several storylines involving
the rich and famous are just plain banal. Still, it's beautifully directed
and Leonardo DiCaprio provides a singular performance as the
charismatic, driven and off kilter Hughes. It is a giddy journey that
ultimately is compelling, moving and heartfelt in a way that suggests
Scorsese may indeed have a couple more rabbits in his hat.
Distant.
This Turkish film won several awards at Cannes 2003 and it's easy to
see why this uncompromising look at modern alienation was embraced critically
rather than commercially. The yarn begins with the arrival of a country
cousin to the home of his photographer relative in Ankara. He talks
a good game but it turns out he's incapable of following through on
even the most trivial promises. The photographer is also blocked but
in a darker, psychological morass. What's remarkable about this little
gem is how little transpires on the surface. It has an icy veneer and
you can feel the pent up emotional eruption brewing if it could only
find an outlet.
Hotel Rwanda.
The civil war and genocide that occurred in the African nation back
in 1994 was one of the darkest chapters of the past century. The film
by Terry George, while unstinting in conveying the horror, elects
to remember one man that made a difference and the similarities to Schindler's
List do not go unnoticed. Paul Rusesenbagina manages a four
star hotel in Kingali and when the hostilities break out and the European
executives flee, he find himself in charge. In an exceptionally riveting
performance, Don Cheadle portrays the real life personality as
someone that will not look away and turns the hotel into a refuge camp,
defending its several hundred occupants by guile, suasion and whatever
other assets he can muster to the task.
Maria Full of
Grace. This first feature by Joshua Marston is a stunning
debut. The title character is a young woman in Columbia who becomes
a drug mule after losing her job. It's a harrowing odyssey that graphically
depicts the ruthlessness of the trade and her journey to America where
the disorientation of entering an alien environment is more frightening
than any splatter sequel. It seems genuine and authentic and - if one
hadn't been bombarded by press coverage - the work of a South American
with full knowledge of the milieu.
The Motorcycle
Diaries. In a year overflowing with biopics, this chronicle of the
life of Ernesto Guevara before he was "Che" rests at
the top of the heap. In 1952, he and a buddy climbed aboard a vintage
Norton 500 with plans to traverse the continent South to North. They
are a couple of aimless, well-heeled youths and initially the film,
adapted by Jose Rivera, appears to be no more than a series of
antics loosely basted and set against some extraordinary travelogue
footage. Director Walter Salles never rushes his story or pushes
his points. It was a life transforming experience etched in the faces
of common folk who lived along the Andes. Of all the 2004 releases,
this is the one whose images remain the most vivid and haunting in my
memory.
The Phantom of
the Opera. The choice apt to give me the greatest amount of grief.
But it had me from "hello," so to speak. I loved it on stage,
I'm exceptionally fond of the 1942 film and it remains one of the great
dramas of unrequited love. In adapting Andrew Lloyd Webber's
musical to screen, director Joel Schumacher opts to pour it on
visually and emotionally. One can quibble about starting on a high note
but this is one story that can sustain such trenchant passion. Gerard
Butler doesn't quite have the chops as an interpretive singer but
he's more than up to the task of getting across The Phantom's ardor,
anger and pathos and Emmy Rossum provides a deft balance of courage
and vulnerability as the object of desire. It is spectacular spectacle.
The Return.
The Russian cinema has been in disarray since Glasnost but this drama
about an estranged father and son reunited for a car trip of mysterious
purpose bodes well for the future. Strikingly unsentimental it evolves
as an apt metaphor for a society in transition. Both characters (and
another son) eye the other with suspicion, trying to decipher the truth
beneath postures that cannot possibly be credible. This first feature
by Andrei Zvyagintsev has a ragged quality that allows for many
side trips along the route and a shocking conclusion I'm certain is
forever branded in my mind.
The Sea Inside.
There were a number of memorable performances in last year's crop
of movies, but Javier Bardem's work in this Spanish drama - based
on a true story - was the stand out of 2004 in my book. Playing the
quadriplegic writer Ramon Sampedro, he gives a startlingly effective
turn that mostly registers in his eyes (a couple of brief flashbacks
recall his youth prior to the crippling accident). The screen Sampedro
is charismatic, sexy, funny, acerbic, passionate and especially determined.
He has reached a point in his life where he can see no future and would
like to end it with dignity but the courts and the church aren't about
to let him go into that good night (the theme also surfaces in Million
Dollar Baby). It's a starting about turn for director Alejandro
Amenabar's last outing, the Gothicly stylish The Others,
and suggests an amazing versatility few of his contemporaries can match.
Spring, Summer,
Autumn, Winter
and Spring. In the unlikely event that you've
been napping for the past three years, the emerging national cinema
of note is located in South Korea. Emerging isn't exactly correct for
the Koreans have produced a steady stream of quality films (as well
as local popular comedies) for at least two decades but it's really
only recently that the world has caught up to the unusual array of films
from the Asian nation. Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter
and
Spring is atypical of the country's predilection for genre movies
and searing social exposes. It is truly Zen-like with the cycle of life
tied to changing seasons. In this instance a young boy arrives at a
remote temple and is taken under the wing of an elderly monk. The seasons
are not consecutive, so the boy evolves quickly into his teens and early
twenties and with the passage of time finds himself questioning the
old ways and leaving the fold. It's both an elegy to traditional values
and an affirmation of the resilience of the human spirit.
-
by Leonard Klady