Christopher
Guest doesn't especially like hearing his movies - This Is
Spinal Tap, Waiting for Guffman, Best in Show and, opening Wednesday,
A Mighty Wind -- described as mockumentaries.
The 55-year-old
multi-hyphenate artist argues that while most of his films are shot
in documentary style, they aren't intended to mock anyone or document
anything. They're reality-based, not in a network-TV sense, but one
that allows the assorted dog shows, heavy metal concerts, community
theater productions and folk reunions to serve as backdrops for comic
character studies of people obsessed with their work or hobbies. Of
course, it's much easier for journalists to label them "mockumentaries"
and be done with it.
A Mighty Wind
imagines a scenario in which a group of folk musicians - 40 years
removed from the genre's heyday - are brought together as part of
a tribute to their recently deceased manager and financial mentor.
The interpersonal dynamics on display are at once touching and hilarious,
especially those leading up to the long-awaited reunion of singing
sweethearts Mitch & Mickey (Eugene Levy and Catherine
O'Hara). Baby Boomers will get the biggest kick out of A Mighty
Wind, but, typically, the comedy crosses all generational boundaries.
Movie City News
interviewed Guest last month in Los Angeles. A separate interview
with co-writer, co-star Eugene Levy follows tomorrow.
MCN: Audiences
of a certain age are going to have a blast trying to guess which artists
inspired the Main Street Singers, Folksmen and Mitch
& Mickey.
CHRISTOPHER
GUEST: There were a lot of groups like that in those days ...
the Back Porch Majority, the Rooftop Singers, the New
Christy Minstrels, maybe a half-dozen groups of a dozen or more
people, and they made records that almost all sounded the same. There
were tons of trios
the Kingston Trio
Peter,
Paul & Mary. Then, there were all the duos
Ian &
Sylvia, the Farinas.
MCN: You
seem to have a personal relationship with the music, though.
CG: This
was the kind of music I played myself, in Greenwich Village, when
I was living in New York in the '60s. I played at the Bitter End and
in Washington Square, so I didn't have to do a lot of research. We
picked these three types of groups, because they represented different
kinds of folk music.
MCN: What
happened to the lone protest singer
Bob Dylan, Joan Baez,
Phil Ochs?
CG: It
probably would have added too much baggage, because the undercurrent
of their music was so serious. That's not what the story's about.
We use folk music as a backdrop for a story about these characters
and how they're trying to get back to that life.
We projected that
on top of the main thing, which involves the situation with Mitch
& Mickey. It's very emotional, and that emotion is what's at the
core of the movie. You couldn't lay a heavy civil-rights thing on
top of that.
MCN: Mitch
& Mickey reminded me of Ian & Sylvia, and the fabled
break-up of Bob Dylan and Joan Baez, and how folkies
would obsess over their relationships.
CG: There
also were Jim & Judy and the Farinas, and on and
on. There was always some kind of drama going on around the duos.
And, because their songs often were about romance, it only heightened
the drama. So, when Eugene and I were writing the story, we put this
emotional element at the core of the film.
MCN: There
must be something endearing and timeless about the genre. The XM and
Sirius satellite radio services even have channels dedicated to folk
music.
CG: It's
out there. There are young people playing folk music on campuses.
Every major city has its own folk scene and folk clubs.
MCN: Within
the cultural milieus described in your films, the characters display
an almost cult-like obsession with the dog shows, community theater
and heavy-metal scenes. It's their world, and almost nothing seems
to exists outside of it.
CG: Absolutely.
MCN: But,
you're not mocking these people, as some critics seem to think?
CG: No.
But I am interested in the notion that people can become so obsessed
by their world that they lose sense and awareness of how they appear
to other people. They're so earnest about it. But that's true of so
many things.
MCN: How
do you come up with your ideas?
CG: I don't
work with high-concept things that start with a premise, "Wouldn't
it be funny if there was this spy who met a ..." For me, it could
be, "What about people who sell shoes? That must be a bizarre
world ... when they meet at conventions and talk about shoes."
That sort of thing
fascinates me. Someone sells urinal cakes on the road. There are these
worlds out there and it doesn't matter what it is. They're fascinating.
MCN: The
characters are extreme, but also very recognizable.
CG: We
populate the stories with people who share certain traits. Invariably,
someone will say, "I know that guy." Every world has odd
people. After Waiting for Guffman came out, people would come
up to me and say, "I know that guy because he was my theater
teacher in high school."
But, there are
180,000 people like that out there. It's not about one person. That's
human behavior, and it's what I like to watch. I like to sit in the
park and watch people.
MCN: I
was struck by the smiles on the Bohners (John Michael Higgins
and Jane Lynch). They were part of a contemporary New Christy
Minstrels-type group, but they could have been part of a cult.
CG: With
the Main Street Singers, there's this overlay of "What the hell
is going on here? Why are they so happy?" Then, there's their
thing about color therapy.
MCN: There's
a very fine line between wholesome and creepy. Laurie Bohner, for
instance, has no problem admitting that she once starred in porn films.
CG: I've
always wondered about those groups, who sing in theme parks. What's
really going on there? There's a kind of forced bliss.
So we give you
a glimpse of this color religion the Bohners are into. That's the
kind of thing we add to the characters.
MCN: Was
there much of a learning curve for the actors playing these musicians?
CG: No,
they understood immediately. I said, "You know the kind of group
where there's this vaguely, almost religious thing
where they're
always very up."
Parker Posey's
amazing at it. There was a bit more of a back story to her character,
but, all we learn about her is that "she was on the street"
before joining the Main Street Singers Sometimes, the more you don't
say about someone, the better it is.
MCN: I
once covered a ventriloquist convention in Las Vegas, and all of your
movies remind me of that experience.
CG: I'd
kill to do that. I did a little bit of ventriloquism in Best in Show. In fact, I found a journal from my family that went back
200 years, and one of my great, great, great, great ancestors was
a ventriloquist, in London in 1802.
It was eerie because
I did ventriloquism when I was a kid. I never had any training. The
voices just came to me.
MCN: Working
with the same group of actors must be helpful.
CG: These
are people I trust implicitly. I revere their talents and they're
good friends. What could be better than getting to play with your
friends, literally.
MCN: I
imagine you're able to communicate by shorthand?
CG: They're
miles ahead of me. There's not a lot of explaining. Everything's at
a pretty high level of communication.
MCN: You
have a core of fans that will see anything you make on the first weekend.
It takes other people time to discover your movies. There's a delayed
response.
CG: With
Spinal Tap, we didn't do anything in the theaters, but it's
done extremely well over the last 20 years in video. Best in Show
has done extremely well in video.
The movies have
a way of seeping out there over time. We don't put them in 2,000 theaters.
It wouldn't work that way.
MCN: How
about the marketing ... posters that remind audiences of your other
movies.
CG: It's
all up to me. It's simple and to the point.
How else would
they know what to look for? There aren't many familiar names.
MCN: Besides
collaborating with Eugene Levy on the screenplay, you also
put his character through an emotional wringer
sort of a cross
between late-Bob Dylan and early-John Denver.
CG: We've
been working together for about eight years. We both came up with
the same idea for Mitch. Because it played so much against type for
Eugene, we both saw it as a challenge ... a stretch.
An
Interview With Eugene Levy