Wednesday, December 19, 2002
COMMENTARY
FOOL'S
GOLD
IT'S A SMALL WORLD FOR GLOBERS
by Leonard Klady
(LAFCA Member)
___________________________
Some
very unusual things occurred with the announcement of the Golden Globe
nominees Thursday.
Now, the Globes
for good and ill, have risen in stature and power to second only to
the Oscars. Admittedly it's a distant second but the organization has
made hay (and reaped a financial bonanza) as the event that presages
the really big show. With multiple categories that loosely define films
as dramas or musical/comedy it has in recent time served as a short
list for Academy members.
The curiosity about
its 2002 nominees is that rather than expanding the list of contenders,
it's wrapped it in shrink foil. With the exception of My Big Fat
Greek Wedding and Igby Goes Down, it appears that the group
simply didn't see anything produced outside the Hollywood mainstream
or its specialized divisions. Also completely shut out were Denzel
Washington's fine directorial debut Antwone Fisher, The
Rookie (though Dennis Quaid received a nod as a support for
Far from Heaven), Narc and Insomnia.
While the group
honored the holocaust drama The Pianist as one of the best dramas
and the title performance by Adrien Brody was cited, neither
its director nor screenwriter made the cut. The Globers - who have a
penchant for popular fare - also were surprisingly light in honors for
Catch Me If You Can and The Road to Perdition and can anyone
explain how Nicholas Nickleby's sole mention was as best musical
or comedy?
The race, based
on the group's ballot, would appear to be between About Schmidt
and The Hours among the dramas and Chicago and Adaptation
in other categories. It's hardly reflective of the spectrum of quality
work in 2002.
Those who have covered
the awards circuit for years can tell you horror stories about how the
members of the Hollywood Foreign Press have flexed their muscles and
punished or over-praised individuals and films. However, as its profile
has risen, one has seen real strides internally to clean up its act
and credibility.
That said, it's
current slate of nominees gives the appearance of a bygone era when
the industry felt it could buy its way onto the ballot. There's something
wrong when a group with as diverse a membership as the HFP produces
as narrow a group of options. It's not mischief; it's not graft, it's
something engrained into the fabric of the organization that continues
to support an industry attitude that views the group with wariness and
suspicion.